AI security research and tools

John Daniel Kearney · San Francisco


Evaluation integrity and agent security

My research at AUTHENSOR concerns evaluation integrity and agent security: scoring errors, benchmark exploitation, unreliable judges, tool permissions, prompt injection and execution controls.

I want experiments that can be reproduced, evaluation software that can be depended on, and independent checks of the improvements claimed by automated research. I am building 15 Research Lab for AI-assisted hardware research and physical AI safety testing. Its research is listed separately below.

That research connects to practical vulnerability discovery and remediation. I’m credited as an independent finder of MLflow CVE-2026-64849; CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog cites my public report and the upstream fix.

For accepted upstream fixes and reports, see the work record. My papers are also published under John Kearney; ORCID 0009-0008-1382-5139.


AUTHENSOR research

  • The Evaluator Trust Boundary
    Preprint · John Kearney, Authensor, Inc. · 28 July 2026

    What happens when a model can influence the artifacts used to judge or reward it? This work organizes recurring evaluation failures into ten mechanisms, with public evidence, a detector and a bounded training experiment. Paper PDF.

  • Evaluator Trust Boundary taxonomy

    Ten documented failure mechanisms and repair patterns, including injected verdicts, fail-open errors, dropped denominators, forged execution artifacts and evaluation-context leakage. Each has a stable identifier and linked evidence. Taxonomy source.


Other security research


Evaluation and security tools

  • etb-scan tests whether injected candidate text can flip an LLM judge's verdict. It includes attack scenarios, benign controls, integrations and reported runs. The scanner covers ETB-01; the taxonomy is broader. MIT license.

  • Trust-Boundary demonstration scores the same behavior against an exploitable reward and a protected ground-truth reward. This runnable public demo has an evaluation license; it is not open source.

  • AUTHENSOR contains public implementation work on agent safety and action controls. MIT license.

  • SafeClaw is an agent implementation designed to route actions through AUTHENSOR checks before execution. MIT license.

  • ai-seclists provides AI-security payloads and wordlists for prompt-injection, jailbreak and model-exploitation research. Published through AUTHENSOR under the MIT license, with 15 Research Lab also named in the copyright.

  • prompt-injection-benchmark provides benchmark materials for testing AI safety scanners against prompt-injection cases. MIT license, with AUTHENSOR / 15 Research Lab attribution.


Hardware and physical AI safety

I am building 15 Research Lab as a venture for AI-assisted hardware research and physical AI safety testing.

rtsilicon is my RTL security scanner for Verilog, SystemVerilog, VHDL, and Chisel/Migen. It flags patterns such as missing security-register resets, unsafe DMA address handling, and conflicting nonblocking assignments, with source locations, CWE mappings, and repair guidance.

The source is published through my personal GitHub account. My accepted contributions to Yosys, NEORV32 and PULP Platform are on the hardware and formal-tools work record.


Research at 15 Research Lab


Fellowship and support

  • SPAR / Sampura Research. I am a SPAR research fellow working with Sampura Research on datasets for evaluating the accuracy and robustness of human and AI safety judges. The project is mentored by Rishub Jain and Joshua Jacob, both formerly at Google DeepMind. Sampura team.

  • Foresight Institute grantee. My work is recognized in the 2026 AI for Security program for adversarial auditing of AI safety evaluation infrastructure, connecting ETB research to upstream repairs and related work at 15 Research Lab.

  • Survival and Flourishing Fund. AUTHENSOR appears in SFF's 2026 recommendations for general support of AI safety evaluation security auditing.